Sunday, October 19, 2008

Eating kangaroos could help fight global warming: scientist

SYDNEY (AFP) - - An offbeat suggestion that Australians should eat kangaroos instead of cattle and sheep has been given a scientific stamp of approval by the government's top climate change adviser.

The belching and farting of millions of farm animals is a major contributor to Australia's greenhouse gas emissions, Professor Ross Garnaut noted in a major report to the government on global warming.

Kangaroos, on the other hand, emit negligible amounts of methane gas.

If farmers were included in a system requiring industry to buy permits for the gas they produce, the cost of meat would rise and could lead to a change in eating habits, Garnaut said in the 600 page report released Wednesday.

"For most of Australia's human history -- around 60,000 years -- kangaroo was the main source of meat," he said.

"It could again become important. However, there are some significant barriers to this change, including livestock and farm management issues, consumer resistance and the gradual nature of change in food tastes."

Garnaut cited a study looking at the potential for kangaroos to replace sheep and cattle for meat production in Australia's rangelands, where kangaroos are already harvested.

The study concludes that by 2020, beef cattle and sheep numbers could be reduced by seven million and 36 million respectively, allowing for an increase in kangaroo numbers from 34 million now to 240 million by 2020.

This would be more than enough to replace the lost lamb and beef production, and kangaroo meat would become more profitable than cattle and sheep as the price of emissions permits increased.

Garnaut's report said livestock, mainly cattle and sheep, are responsible for some 67 percent of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite being the national animal and appearing on the Australian coat of arms, millions of kangaroos are slaughtered in the wild each year to control their numbers and much of the meat is used for pet food.

The idea of farming them for human consumption is controversial, but many health-conscious Australians already eat kangaroo meat.

"It's low in fat, it's got high protein levels, it's very clean in the sense that basically it's the ultimate free range animal," says Peter Ampt of the University of New South Wales's institute of environmental studies.

taken from: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20081001/tap-australia-climate-food-kangaroos-off-5a1703c.html

Pretty funny huh! So Charles Wright identifies four media functions that affect receivers and I’m going to try to fit them all into this pretty.. STRANGE news article.

There is the Surveillance (information) the gathering and disseminating of information. Giving them the instrumental information they need to get through a day. So yes, from this online news article, we now know and important fact to get through the day! Eat the kangaroo meat, save the world! ( I can’t decide if I’m more amazed that people are receptive to the idea, or that scientists have actually thought of that idea in the first place.)

Then comes Correlation (analysis and evaluation) reporting facts, interpret news events and by analyzing social problems. This article has more or less given us a brief analysis of one of the reasons for global warming. I now know that cattle and sheep contribute to “67 percent of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.”

Next, Cultural transmission (education and socialization of receivers) which reinforces social ideals and passes on cultural understandings from one generation to the next. The one and only connection I made was that I can’t imagine anyone of us, or you for that matter, eating kangaroo meat as a staple food! THINK OF baby ROO! AND mama KANGA! (if any of you remember pooh’s friends..)

Last but not least, Entertainment (enjoyment and gratification) which arouses our emotions.

I don’t know about you, but when I read this for the first time I definitely went from amusement to disgust and back to amusement and then to amazement and then to disgust… and I can keep on typing but I’m sure you get the circle of emotions I felt.

This piece of news would be what I call really offbeat news. I mean it probably sounds normal to aussies, but for me... still kinda queasy thinking about it.

anyway, after some time I got again to thinking, if we can eat chickens and cows and think of it as perfectly normal, what’s to stop us from eating kangaroos! Cows aren’t any less cute than kangaroos, and I think both animals have a mean kick.

But that’s beside the point.

My point would be that, I foresee a permanent fixture on our menus soon. Think roo and chips! Yum…

4 comments:

kyun said...

Roo and chips! Haha you're sick man. I'll stick to my fish anyday. I have my kangaroo friends.

I doubt the day when we eat kangaroos like we eat chicken will ever come so quickly. There are other ways to save the earth, like watch Captain Planet, turn off the lights and electricity if you are not using them, blah blah. You get the drift. It is just...strange to think of eating kangaroo. It might be the norm in Australia, but it won't be the norm for mine anytime soon.

Better still, invent something so that animals don't fart, or give them nicer food so that their fart will smell sweeter. That'll be good, don't you think?

silent reverie said...

HAHAHA. This is so.. entertainment-ny! Then again, as weird as it sounds... is there any truth behind it? Hmm.. since it has been given a "scientific stamp of approval" .. probably, eh?

Surveillance, then, it must be! But i'm still rolling my eyes. =P ACtually, i've had roo meet before, and it was considered a delicacy, if i remember correctly. Yummy. I wonder if it's classified as red meat... -drools-.

MArsupial?? What's that supposed to be? Still seems more like red meat than white.. oh no, am i making you nauseous? Haha. Apologies, Coach!

I shall follow Kyun's fine example and provide some constructive comments. I guess if this idea takes off, Australia being the native land of Kangaroos will stand to profit the most. Do you remember genetically modified cattle? Holy crap, i wonder if people are still consuming these products.. must be right? If not "organic" woould not sound so good. OR was the whole genetically modified vs. organic thing about crops and vegetables? I don't even have an idea! Argh. Anyway, i was just toying with the notion that kangaroos may go the way of undergoing ... scientific experiments to "increase yield" as well.

Sick, isn't it? For living animals to be treated as.. crops where it's all about the production, growth, and yield. Hmm.

Hmmmmm.

We all know one. said...

Heyo JO!

nic here.

yep i am not too surprised about eating kangaroos...

and i am not too concerned about the methane that livestock produce. i meant, what about us humans? i feel that we are the main cause of global warming...

as for eating baby roo and mama too, i would love to have a go. anyway i am sure almost every singaporean have tasted newater... consumed turtle soup, crocodile stew, black pepper deer meat, shark's fin, frog legs, kway chap... so why not deer meat???

what's new?

do you know that the population of chicken outnumbers us humans? aussies already started consuming them (by the way i never knew kangaroos numbred in the millions..), and if they manage to export them here (please AVA) i'll be one of the first to try!

but yes, we do need to moniter the situation first, whether kangaroo meat is safe for consumption, whether they contain melamine, or some MAD disease, before we see kangaroo tendergrill at burger king's, or a 2-piece meal at KFC (Kangaroos and Fried Chicken).

i just do not see how they will help(eating them instead) an ailing planet. i just see them as potential food for humans.

O, my soccer shoes (adidas)are made of kangaroo leather. Gucci in the future?

perhaps.

(PS: do not trust these studies as they are not internationally recognised; not enough research is done to prove they're saviours. This is just one of the evil work of the media to keep us tickled.)

Anonymous said...

Kangaroos, emit negligible amounts of methane gas. f farmers were included in a system requiring industry to buy permits for the gas they produce, the cost of meat would rise and could lead to a change in eating habits.The study concludes that by 2020, beef cattle and sheep numbers could be reduced by seven million and 36 million respectively, allowing for an increase in kangaroo numbers from 34 million now to 240 million by 2020.This would be more than enough to replace the lost lamb and beef production, and kangaroo meat would become more profitable than cattle and sheep as the price of emissions permits increased.
Garnaut's report said livestock, mainly cattle and sheep, are responsible for some 67 percent of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions.

----------------
kimrennin
social media optimization